Evaluation of the Microbiological, Physicochemical, and Nutritional Quality, and Labeling Compliance of Commercial Infant Cereals Imported and Marketed in the Republic of Guinea
Évaluation de la Qualité Microbiologique, Physico-Chimique, Nutritionnelle et de la Conformité de l’Étiquetage des Farines Infantiles Industrielles Importées et Commercialisées en République de Guinée
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.67260/hra.v4i8.7914Keywords:
Infant Cereals, Microbiological quality, Nutritional analysis, Labeling, Guinea, Food safety, Micronutrients, Chemical contaminantsAbstract
Introduction. Infant malnutrition remains a major public health problem in low- and middle-income countries. Commercial infant flours, which are often fortified with proteins, vitamins, and minerals, play an essential role in infant feeding. However, their sanitary and nutritional quality can be compromised by the presence of microbiological or chemical contaminants, while their compliance with regulatory requirements remains variable. In Guinea, local data on these products remain limited. The objective was to evaluate the microbiological, physicochemical, and nutritional quality, as well as the labeling compliance, of commercial infant flours imported and marketed in the Republic of Guinea. Methods. This was a cross-sectional descriptive and analytical study conducted on 575 samples collected between January 2025 and June 2026. The analyses focused on microbiological (ISO), physicochemical (AOAC), and nutritional (Kjeldahl, Soxhlet, Atwater) parameters, micronutrients, and contaminants (AAS, chromatography), as well as labeling and sensory evaluation. Data were processed using statistical tests (chi-square, ANOVA). Results. The flours mostly originated from Asia, accounting for a proportion of 46.4%. Physicochemical parameters complied with preservation standards. However, protein levels (10%), lipid levels (8.1%), and vitamin A levels (311.7 µg RE/100 g) were lower than the declared values and Codex/WHO standards. Overall nutritional compliance was 37.7%, and micronutrient compliance was 49.7%. On the microbiological level, no pathogenic contamination was detected. Conversely, pesticide residues exceeded regulatory thresholds, with a level of 0.015 mg/kg against a maximum residue limit of 0.01 mg/kg. Labeling showed deficiencies, particularly regarding the recommended age, for which compliance was 61.9%. Conclusion. Imported infant flours in Guinea present a satisfactory microbiological quality, but exhibit nutritional deficiencies as well as labeling shortcomings. These results highlight the need to strengthen inspections at entry points and marketplaces, alongside analytical laboratory controls, to guarantee the safety and nutritional quality of products intended for infants.
References
UNICEF, World Health Organization, World Bank Group. Levels and trends in child malnutrition: UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Joint Child Malnutrition Estimates. 2024 edition. New York: UNICEF; 2024.
2. World Health Organization. Infant and young child feeding. Geneva: WHO; 2025.
3. Codex Alimentarius Commission. Standard for Infant Formula and Formulas for Special Medical Purposes Intended for Infants (CXS 72-1981). Rome: FAO/WHO; Revised 2023.
4. World Health Organization. Guiding principles for complementary feeding of the breastfed child. Geneva: WHO; 2003.
5. Fusi V, et al. Microbiological characteristics of powdered infant and follow-on formulae and safety concerns: A review. Heliyon. 2025;11:e42927.
6. FAO, World Health Organization. Assessing the microbiological risk in powdered formula for infants and young children. Rome: FAO; 2024.
7. International Organization for Standardization. ISO 4833-1:2013. Microbiology of the food chain—Horizontal method for the enumeration of microorganisms—Part 1: Colony count at 30°C by the pour plate technique. Geneva: ISO; 2013.
8. International Organization for Standardization. ISO 21528-2:2017. Microbiology of the food chain—Horizontal method for the detection and enumeration of Enterobacteriaceae. Geneva: ISO; 2017.
9. International Organization for Standardization. ISO 4832:2006. Microbiology of food and animal feeding stuffs—Horizontal method for the enumeration of coliforms. Geneva: ISO; 2006.
10. International Organization for Standardization. ISO 21527-2:2008. Microbiology of food and animal feeding stuffs—Enumeration of yeasts and moulds. Geneva: ISO; 2008.
11. International Organization for Standardization. ISO 6579-1:2017. Microbiology of the food chain—Detection, enumeration and serotyping of Salmonella. Geneva: ISO; 2017.
12. International Organization for Standardization. ISO 11290-1:2017. Microbiology of the food chain—Detection and enumeration of Listeria monocytogenes. Geneva: ISO; 2017.
13. Codex Alimentarius Commission. General principles of food hygiene (CXC 1-1969). Rome: FAO/WHO; 2022.
14. Buchanan RL, Oni R. Use of microbiological indicators for assessing hygiene controls for the manufacture of powdered infant formula. J Food Prot. 2012;75(5):989–997.
15. AOAC International. Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International. 21st ed. Gaithersburg (MD): AOAC International; 2019.
16. Nielsen SS. Food Analysis. 5th ed. Cham: Springer; 2017.
17. FAO. Food Energy: Methods of Analysis and Conversion Factors. FAO Food and Nutrition Paper No.77. Rome: FAO; 2003.
18. Merrill AL, Watt BK. Energy Value of Foods: Basis and Derivation. Agriculture Handbook No.74. Washington DC: USDA; 1973.
19. World Health Organization. Food safety. Geneva: WHO; 2024.
20. Codex Alimentarius Commission. General Standard for Contaminants and Toxins in Food and Feed (CXS 193-1995). Rome: FAO/WHO; 2023.
21. International Organization for Standardization. ISO 5725-1:2023. Accuracy (trueness and precision) of measurement methods and results—Part 1: General principles and definitions. Geneva: ISO; 2023.
22. European Commission. Guidance document for competent authorities for the control of compliance with EU legislation on Regulation (EU) No 1169/2011 regarding tolerances for nutrition labelling. Brussels: European Commission; 2012.
23. International Organization for Standardization. ISO 8586:2023. Sensory analysis—Selection, training and monitoring of assessors. Geneva: ISO; 2023.
24. International Organization for Standardization. ISO 13299:2016. Sensory analysis—Methodology—General guidance for establishing a sensory profile. Geneva: ISO; 2016.
25. Codex Alimentarius Commission. General Standard for the Labelling of Prepackaged Foods (CXS 1-1985). Rome: FAO/WHO; latest revision.
26. Field A, Miles J, Field Z. Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics. 6th ed. London: Sage Publications; 2024.
27. Montgomery DC. Design and Analysis of Experiments. 11th ed. Hoboken (NJ): John Wiley & Sons; 2024.
28. Elroe Mario, Belay A, Amare E, et al. Evaluation of the quality and safety of commercial complementary foods: Implications for nutrient adequacy and conformance with national and international standards. Food Sci Nutr. 2024.
29. Adu-Gyamfi A, Asante M, Mensah P, et al. Physicochemical and nutritional characteristics of commercial complementary foods and cereal-based infant flours in Ghana. Food Sci Nutr. 2024.
30. Oliveira LC, Silva FM, Santos MM, et al. Physicochemical characteristics and nutritional composition of commercial infant cereal foods. Food Chem. 2024.
31. Oladimeji O, Adepoju O, Akinyemi O, et al. Nutritional evaluation of commercial cereal-legume complementary foods for infants in Nigeria. J Food Compos Anal. 2025.
32. Coyle DH, Shahid M, Parkins K, Hu M, Padovan M, Dunford EK. An evaluation of the nutritional and promotional profile of commercial foods for infants and toddlers in the United States. Nutrients. 2024;16(16):2782.
33. Diongue A, Mama OM, Souho T, et al. Mapping and nutrient profiles of commercially produced complementary foods in West Africa. Matern Child Nutr. 2023.
34. Masters WA, Nene MD, Bell W. Nutrient composition of premixed and packaged complementary foods for sale in low- and middle-income countries: Lack of standards threatens infant growth. Matern Child Nutr. 2017;13(Suppl 2):e12430. doi:10.1111/mcn.12430.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Amadou Sylla, Sâa Gérard Tolno, Fatoumata Bah, Ismaël Ngnie Teta, Mohamed Kadiatou Sylla, Nènè Adama Sow, Taliby Dos Camara, Sidikiba Sidibé

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work
















