Bone Healing Imaging: Physical Principles and Radiological Applications
Imagerie de la Consolidation des Fractures : Principes Physiques et Applications en Radiologie
Keywords:
bone consolidation, medical imaging, conventional radiography, CT, MRI, bone healing phases, multimodal approachAbstract
RÉSUMÉ
La consolidation osseuse est un processus biologique complexe qui se déroule en trois phases : inflammatoire, réparation et remodelage. L'imagerie est un pilier essentiel permettant de suivre l'évolution de la réparation osseuse et de détecter d'éventuelles complications. Chaque phase présente des caractéristiques radiologiques spécifiques, visibles grâce à différentes techniques d'imagerie. Les radiographies standard restent l'examen de première intention, offrant une vue d'ensemble de l'alignement des fragments osseux et de la formation du cal osseux. Cependant, leur résolution est limitée pour les fractures complexes ou les tissus mous. Le scanner (tomodensitométrie) apporte une résolution spatiale supérieure, idéale pour les fractures articulaires ou les fractures comminutives. Il est aussi très utile en cas de recherche de complications d’une fracture profonde (rachis, pelvis, base du crâne). L'IRM (Imagerie par Résonance Magnétique) est particulièrement utile pour évaluer les tissus mous, la moelle osseuse et la vascularisation, notamment dans les fractures de stress ou les complications infectieuses. L'échographie est un outil en plein essor dans le domaine de la radiologie musculosquelettique, y compris pour le diagnostic et le suivi des fractures. Bien qu'elle ne remplace pas les techniques d'imagerie traditionnelles comme les radiographies, le scanner ou l'IRM, elle offre des avantages spécifiques dans certaines situations. Enfin, la scintigraphie osseuse offre une imagerie fonctionnelle, détectant précocement les anomalies métaboliques, mais avec une résolution spatiale limitée. En conclusion, une approche multimodale, adaptée au contexte clinique et au type de fracture, est essentielle pour optimiser le diagnostic et le suivi des fractures.
ABSTRACT
Bone consolidation is a complex biological process occurring in three sequential phases: inflammatory, repair, and remodeling. Imaging plays a pivotal role in tracking the progression of bone healing and identifying potential complications. Each phase exhibits distinct radiological features, detectable through various imaging modalities. Conventional radiographs remain the first-line imaging modality, providing an overview of bone fragment alignment and callus formation. However, their resolution is limited in cases of complex fractures or soft tissue assessment. Computed tomography (CT) offers superior spatial resolution, making it ideal for evaluating articular or comminuted fractures, as well as detecting complications in deep fractures (e.g., pelvic, spinal or skull base injuries). Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is particularly valuable for assessing soft tissues, bone marrow, and vascularization, especially in stress fractures or infectious complications. Ultrasound has emerged as a rapidly evolving tool in musculoskeletal radiology, aiding in fracture diagnosis and follow-up. While it does not replace traditional imaging techniques such as radiography, CT, or MRI, it offers unique advantages in specific clinical scenarios. Lastly, bone scintigraphy provides functional imaging, enabling early detection of metabolic abnormalities, albeit with limited spatial resolution. In conclusion, a multimodal imaging approach, tailored to the clinical context and fracture type, is essential to optimize diagnostic accuracy and fracture management.
References
1. Theodore E. Keats, Mark W. Anderson. Atlas of Normal Roentgen Variants That May Simulate Disease. 9th Edition, 2012. Elsevier. New York.
2. Radiopaedia. Fracture Healing. 2023. Disponible sur : [https://radiopaedia.org] (https://radiopaedia.org).
3. Browner BD, Jupiter JB, Krettek C, Anderson PA. Skeletal Trauma: Basic Science, Management, and Reconstruction. 6e éd. Elsevier; 2020.
4. Bhandari M, Guyatt GH, Swiontkowski MF, Tornetta P, Sprague S, Schemitsch EH. Reamed versus nonreamed intramedullary nailing of lower extremity long bone fractures: a systematic overview and meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84(11):2093-6. PMID: 12429758.
5. Zura R, Xiong Z, Einhorn T, Watson JT, Ostrum RF, Prayson MJ, et al. Epidemiology of Fracture Nonunion in 18 Human Bones. J Orthop Trauma. 2016;30(9):507-11. doi:10.1097/BOT.0000000000000571.
6. Lenza M, Buchbinder R, Johnston RV, Ferrari BA, Faloppa F. Surgical versus conservative interventions for treating fractures of the middle third of the clavicle. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;(7):CD009363. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD009363.pub3.
7. Rangan A, Handoll H, Brealey S, Jefferson L, Keding A, Martin BC, et al. Surgical vs nonsurgical treatment of adults with displaced fractures of the proximal humerus: the PROFHER randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2015;313(10):1037-47. doi:10.1001/jama.2015.1629.
8. McKee MD, Pedersen EM, Jones C, Stephen DJ, Kreder HJ, Schemitsch EH, et al. Deficits following nonoperative treatment of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88(1):35-40. doi:10.2106/JBJS.D.02795.
9. Tsifountoudis, I., Sidiropoulos, M. D. D., Kalaitzoglou, I., Dionisiadis, E., Haritandi, M. P. A., & Dimitriadis, A. S. (2015, June). The role of CT and MRI in the assessment of tibial plateau fractures according to Schatzker classification. European Congress of Radiology-ESSR 2015.
10. Griffith JF, Rainer TH. Ultrasound in the diagnosis of fractures in children. J Bone Joint Surg. 2000;82(8):1170-3.
11. Patten, R. M., & Mack, L. A. (1993). Ultrasound of the musculoskeletal system. Radiologic Clinics of North America, 31(4), 775-790.
12. Choudhari, K. A., & Lonsdale, R. J. (2001). The role of ultrasound in the management of fractures. Injury, 32(2), 95-99.
13. McNally, E. G. (2014). Practical Musculoskeletal Ultrasound. Elsevier.
14. Bianchi S, Martinoli C. Ultrasound of the Musculoskeletal System. Springer; 2007.
15. Major NM, Anderson MW, Helms CA. Musculoskeletal MRI. 3e éd. Elsevier; 2019.
16. Infections ostéoarticulaires extra-rachidiennes | Medicine Key [Internet]. [cité 13 avr 2025]. Disponible sur: https://clemedicine.com/12-infections-osteoarticulaires-extra-rachidiennes/
17. Van der Wall H, Storey G, Frater C, Murray P. Orthopedic Nuclear Medicine. Springer; 2017.
18. Palestro CJ, Love C. Nuclear medicine and the failed joint replacement: Past, present, and future. J Nucl Med. 2021;62(3):301-8.
19. Even-Sapir, E. (2005). Imaging of malignant bone involvement by morphologic, scintigraphic, and hybrid modalities. Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 46(8), 1356-1367.
20. Ryan, P. J., & Fogelman, I. (1997). The role of nuclear medicine in orthopaedics. Nuclear Medicine Communications, 18(2), 117-125.
21. Biersack, H. J., & Freeman, L. M. (2007). Clinical Nuclear Medicine. Springer. Elgazzar, A. H. (2014). Orthopedic Nuclear Medicine. Springer.
22. Elgazzar, A. H. (2014). Orthopedic Nuclear Medicine. Springer.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Nko’o Amvene Michael Robert, Mballa Jean Claude, Asseme Ntol Evelyne Nadège, Ongolo Zogo Pierre; Samuel Nko'o Amvene
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work
